
How do you show up in ChatGPT? There's no sign-up form and no secret setting. AI assistants that search the web read your site with their own bots, and Google says explicitly that AI Overviews need no special optimization, just a page that's indexed and eligible for a snippet (Google Search Central). You have three jobs: let the bots in, write clear answers an AI can quote, and say the same things about your business everywhere it appears.
The market calls this work GEO (generative engine optimization). This article covers what it means in practice, which bots matter, what we did on our own site and what isn't worth paying for.
SEO helps you appear in Google's list of links. GEO helps you get quoted or recommended in the answer an AI assistant writes. The foundations are the same, but the result looks different:
| Classic SEO | GEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Where you appear | in Google's results list | in the answer written by ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or AI Overviews |
| What the user gets | 10 links, picks one | a ready-made answer with a few cited sources |
| What matters most | page relevance, links, speed | the same, plus direct answers that are easy to extract and quote |
| Who reads your site | Googlebot, Bingbot | Googlebot, plus AI bots: OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot and others |
| How you measure it | rankings, clicks in Search Console | mentions and citations in answers, hard to measure for now |
GEO isn't a separate discipline from SEO. It's SEO done well, for a reader who wants the answer, not ten links.
Yes, even if your clients never open ChatGPT. Across the EU, 32.7% of people aged 16–74 used generative AI tools in 2025, according to Eurostat (Eurostat).
The bigger effect is the one you feel inside Google itself: AI summaries. A Pew Research study of 900 US adults found that when an AI summary appears, people click a classic result on 8% of visits, versus 15% when there's no summary. They click the links cited in the summary itself on only 1% of visits (Pew Research Center).
So when an AI summary appears, clicks drop for everyone, cited sources included. Being cited still matters for visibility, even when it doesn't bring many clicks.
Each assistant has several bots, each with a different job. The search bots are the ones you need to allow in robots.txt:
| Bot | Owner | What it does | If you block it |
|---|---|---|---|
| OAI-SearchBot | OpenAI | indexes sites for ChatGPT search | you no longer appear in ChatGPT search answers (you may still show up as a plain link) |
| GPTBot | OpenAI | collects content for model training | your content isn't used for training; search visibility isn't affected |
| ChatGPT-User | OpenAI | visits a page when a user asks for it | doesn't affect search visibility; as a user action, it may not follow robots.txt |
| PerplexityBot | Perplexity | surfaces and links sites in Perplexity results | Perplexity recommends allowing it so you appear in results |
| Googlebot | regular indexing, also used by AI Overviews and AI Mode | you disappear from Google and from AI Overviews |
Sources: OpenAI, Perplexity, Google.
You can block training (GPTBot) without disappearing from ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot). Block every AI bot "just to be safe" and you vanish from search answers too.
We've applied some of the steps below on navitech.systems, and you can check the result live:
robots.txt has Allow: / for everyone and points to the sitemap.llms.txt with our services, starting prices, company details, projects and articles. It's a Markdown summary an AI agent can read in seconds.Organization, WebSite and a Service for each package, with its starting price. On articles: BlogPosting, with a real person as author, and BreadcrumbList.We don't have separate service pages or an About page yet; we're working on them. We're not promising results. The changes are recent and we don't have before-and-after data yet. When we do, we'll publish it here.
robots.txt. Look for Disallow rules for OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot or Googlebot. If you want to block training, block only GPTBot.The "magic file". llms.txt is a 2024 proposal, not an official standard (llmstxt.org). Google says you don't need new AI files to appear in AI Overviews (Google). We added one because it's quick and does no harm, but we don't expect much from it.
Special AI schema. There isn't any. Google says explicitly that AI features need no special structured data (Google). Structured data helps machines understand a page; it doesn't unlock anything.
Text written for robots. Google treats keyword stuffing as spam (Google), and pages full of questions without real answers have nothing to offer an assistant. Assistants look for sentences that actually answer.
Guarantees of "ranking in ChatGPT". Nobody controls what a model answers. Anyone who guarantees you the top spot in ChatGPT is selling a promise, not a service.
Let OAI-SearchBot access your site, make sure your important pages answer your clients' questions clearly, and keep your company details identical everywhere. Blocking OAI-SearchBot removes you from ChatGPT search answers (OpenAI).
No. Google says there are no extra requirements: the page just has to be indexed and eligible to appear with a snippet in Google Search (Google).
No. GPTBot collects content for model training. For ChatGPT search, OAI-SearchBot is the one that counts (OpenAI).
It's not required. It's a proposal, not a standard (llmstxt.org), and Google doesn't ask for it. It can help AI agents understand your site quickly, and it costs little to make.
There's no guaranteed timeline. OpenAI and Perplexity say a change to robots.txt is picked up in about 24 hours (OpenAI, Perplexity), but that only means the bots have access, not that you'll be cited.
No. AI Overviews draw on Google's index, and assistants cite well-built pages. Without clean technical SEO, GEO has nothing to stand on.
Tell us what site you have and what you want to achieve. We'll reply with a clear quote.
You can see our projects in the Navitech portfolio.
robots.txt and llms.txt: https://navitech.systems/robots.txt, https://navitech.systems/llms.txt













Tell us what you want to build, and we’ll help you turn your idea into a digital product that delivers real results.

NAVITECH SYSTEMS S.R.L. as beneficiary, announces the start of implementation of the project: "BumbleAds", with SMIS CODE 343446, funded from the Regional Program Nord-Est 2021-2027, Priority 1 "A more competitive, more innovative region", Call: Support for developing the innovation capacity of SMEs through demonstrative projects of SMEs proof-of-concept.
The project is implemented in the period 23.12.2025 - 22.12.2027, in Suceava Municipality, University Street No. 15A, Attic, Suceava County, Romania.
The Management Authority is the Agency for Regional Development Nord-Est.
The project's goal consists of developing, testing and validating an intelligent platform called BumbleAds, designed for integrated management of digital marketing campaigns and customer relationships (CRM). The project aims to implement an innovative conceptual model that brings together in a single application functionalities for analysis, reporting, automatic optimization through AI and complete administration of customer relationships.
Objective 1: Development of a "BumbleAds" web platform concept for integrated management of digital marketing campaigns and customer relationships (CRM), validated at TRL level 4.
Objective 2: An evolved and tested BumbleAds web platform concept at TRL level 5
The project has a total value of 1,238,938.34 lei, of which the non-reimbursable financing is 976,387.84 lei, of which ERDF 829,929.66 lei and state budget 146,458.18 lei.
The BumbleAds platform, with the following characteristics:
Project Manager: Daniel-Ionuț GRIGORAȘ, tel.: +40 728.309.319, e-mail: daniel@navitech.systems.
For detailed information about the Regional Program Nord-Est 2021-2027, we invite you to visit https://www.regionordest.ro/ and https://www.adrnordest.ro/ , and regarding other programs co-financed by the European Union, you can access https://mfe.gov.ro
